Ah, yes, then it was #7. Like I said, my friend worked on the construction of that one a decade earlier--it was the Salamon Brother's building--I had been there a few times myself, it was literally between the Twin Towers. What you said of the BBC might not be proof of hanky panky though. If it did indeed report that it collapsed before it actually did it could have just been a flase report--it was burning all morning and afternoon and was probably expected to collapse, so at some point it could have been reported that it did indeed yet had not--yet.
Two planes, three buildings. The skyscraper WTC 7 collapsed several hours later "by itself" (also known as the smoking gun of 9/11). News stations like the BBC reported that it already has been collapsed before it actually happend live in their own news report. That's no conspiracy at all.
There were other buildings destroyed that day, I'm sure that's what Rob is talking about. But it was Tower 1 and 2 that were targeted and went down before our eyes. The others were collateral damage and were burned down later in the day. I'm thinking of #7, which a freind of mine worked on its construction, that sustained so much damage it collapsed about 8 hours later. Maybe Rob means that one?
Comments
JLavery |
deleted_180 |
JLavery |
Ron |
But I don't understand Rob either ;)
JLavery |
deleted_180 |